Saturday, December 22, 2007

These Mac "developers" are really piling it on

So I copied and pasted a couple of articles that weren't mine. Big deal. Nobody writes dozens of extensive blog posts when some guy wearing a red sweater releases blogging software that wastes 752 KB of precious disk space. That's an actual crime in my book. Copyright infringement? Well, like it says in the term itself: it's just infringement. A civil violation at most. Not as bad as the felonious atrocity that are those huge TIFF files and the .Trashes directory. (Note: I'm not a lawyer, but I've had my share of legal troubles. Like when I got arrested for narcotics trafficking. But I totally swear I didn't do it, dude.)

But apparently I got some attention from a bunch of jerks belonging to the Landed Gentry of Mac Development™. Bunch of assholes. One of them calls me "Asswipe of the year". A guy who's blog is called /dev/random. What kind of a jackass calls his blog /dev/random, anyway? Does that mean we can just ignore everything you say because it's random bullshit? (Pretty clever there, making the leap from /dev/random to random bullshit, isn't it? God, I'm so good at this internet blog posting stuff.)

This /dev/random prick also criticizes me for blaming Steve Jobs for the QuickBooks bug:

"He blames every software mishap (such as QuickBook’s desktop overwriting bug) on Apple’s incompetence, in one of his typical rants:"

Well, yeah, duh. You stupid loser. If we were still using good old OpenSTEP, this wouldn't have happened. Because OpenSTEP couldn't write any files to the desktop. BECAUSE THERE WAS NO STUPID DESKTOP WITH FILES ON IT. Dumbass.

What a bunch of Grade A Idiots.

And then there's this "Chuqui 3.0" fellow, who thinks he's really clever adding that version number to his name. Wow. The Landed Gentry of Mac Development™ is so clever. He writes about Rixstep ripping off stepwise. This isn't "ripping off," it's SIMPLE CUT AND PASTE. Isn't that what you Landed Gentry idiots think is so great about graphic user interfaces in the first place?

0 comments: